CLIFF KINCAID…DARK FORCES ARE EMERGING IN AMERICA

The Weather Underground

The Weather Underground (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

May 8, 2013

A “CUTE” LITTLE LIE IS BEING SPUN BY OUR CAPITALIST “FRIENDS” LIKE CLIFF KINCAID. THEY ARE TRYING TO EQUATE SOCIALISM WITH STALINISM, AND EVEN SOCIALISM WITH ISLAM!!!

READ ON AND YOU WILL SEE WHAT WE MEAN BY THE “CUTE LIE”.

THIS IS A RECENT ARTICLE BY KINCAID. SOME OF IT IS TRUE BUT KINCAID LEAVES OUT THAT BILL AYERS WAS MOST LIKELY A CIA OR FBI RECRUIT. WE CANNOT OBVIOUSLY BE CERTAIN BUT THE EVIDENCE POINTS TO THAT. WHY WOULD KINCAID HIDE THAT EVIDENCE?  IN THE FINAL PART WE LOOK AT AN ARTICLE BY JARED ISRAEL ABOUT OBAMA AND AYERS WHICH DOES CLARIFY THINGS SOMEWHAT. THEN OUR OWN ANALYSIS AT THE END.

Bill Ayers and his media groupies

                       

 

By Cliff Kincaid

Bill Ayers’ recent claim that the Weather Underground bombed property, not people, in order to protest the Vietnam War, is two lies in one. First, they specialized in anti-personnel bombs using heavy metal staples. Second, Ayers and his wife Bernardine Dohrn were not opposed to the war, only to a U.S. victory.

As reported by Jim Mackinnon of the Akron Beacon Journal, Ayers maintained, during a speaking appearance, “No one died in the Weather Underground bombings.” He was trying to claim that the Weather Underground was different from the Islamic terrorists in the Boston bombings case.

Of all the media covering Ayers’ newest charges, only Fox News interviewed Larry Grathwohl, an FBI informant in the Weather Underground, who said “Ayers told him personally that fellow Weather Underground member and future wife Bernadine Dohrn set the bomb that killed San Francisco Park Police Sergeant Brian McDonnell in 1970.”

“Bill Ayers told me in Buffalo that we weren’t doing enough bombings and strategic sabotages,” Grathwohl told FoxNews.com. “He complained that it was a sad situation when [Dohrn] had to plan and place the bomb at the San Francisco Park Police station.”

The story went on: “Grathwohl said the bomb used in San Francisco, and the ones that killed the three Weather Underground members, when it exploded prematurely, were all packed with roofing nails and fence staples and designed to kill as many people as possible.”

Five years ago we began our campaign to tell the truth about the Weather Underground’s bombing campaign against police and civilians with our article Tribune Covers for Obama’s Terrorist Friends, about the failure of the Chicago Tribune to report evidence that the Weather Underground planted the bomb that killed Sergeant McDonnell. This was during the 2008 presidential campaign when Obama tried to distance himself from Ayers and Dohrn, who had sponsored his political career.

Over the years we at AIM have reported these facts while the media continued to look the other way. Former FBI informant Larry Grathwohl has consistently testified about Bernardine Dohrn’s role in that bombing. His new and updated book Bringing Down America has that testimony. I confronted Dohrn about her reported role in planting the bomb that killed McDonnell. Our media ignore all of this.

On the claim about Ayers being opposed to the Vietnam War, Grathwohl notes, “The Weather Underground was not an anti-war group. They saw themselves as part of an international revolution with connections in Cuba, China and North Vietnam. They believed they were going to be part of a revolution that would cause the collapse of the United States. Plans for the creation of camps for ‘re-educating’ Americans – and the elimination of 25 million people – were discussed with the belief that protecting the NEW order from a counter-revolution justified wholesale murder.”

If Ayers was opposed to killing people, why were his fingerprints found in a bomb factory in San Francisco that included C-4, and stabbing weapons made to look like pens? Why did the Weather Underground kill police Sergeant Brian V. McDonnell? Why were Ayers’ comrades building anti-personnel bombs to be used at an officers’ dance at Fort Dix? They were the Weather Underground members who died in the bomb blast in a Greenwich Village townhouse, where they were constructing bombs.

Mark Rudd, another member of the Weather Underground, revealed in his book Underground: My Life with SDS and the Weathermen that he was in favor of planting that bomb, saying that he wanted “this country to have a taste of what it had been dishing out daily in Southeast Asia….” What the U.S. had been trying to do was prevent a Communist takeover of South Vietnam.

Ayers spouts his lies because he knows he can get away with them. The media won’t report the truth because they know it would besmirch the reputation of President Obama, whose political career was launched in the Ayers/Dohrn home.

The sins of the press are bad enough. But then we have the Southern Poverty Law Center, which inspired the terrorist attack on the Family Research Council, portraying Ayers as a respected academic. This is a group that is used as an objective resource on “hate groups” by Eric Holder’s Department of Justice.

This is the problem we face today – the U.S. government is run by associates of these terrorists and lunatics.

The FBI’s designation of one of the Weather Underground’s favorite criminal terrorist associates, fugitive cop-killer Joanne Chesimard, as one of the Most Wanted Terrorists, is a potential game-changer. Law enforcement can now investigate her support networks here in the U.S.

Joel Gilbert, director of the film “Dreams from My Real Father,” says it is likely that Barack Obama, when he was a student at Columbia, attended meetings of the May 19 Communist Organization, a support group for the Weather Underground and the Black Liberation Army. Two of their members are still on another FBI wanted list. “I had one source who ID’d Obama as having attended May 19 public meetings,” he tells me. He adds that Obama, in his book Dreams from My Father, describes attending several events in New York City (such as a Malcolm X movie screening) that are identical to documented May 19 events.

Obama’s Marxist background and connections are the story of a lifetime. It’s a story the media “forgot” to cover in their rush to make him President. But the whitewashing of Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn is equally odious.

Yet, we see the same tendency in the failure of publications like Politico even to hint that there is anything wrong with going to work for Al Jazeera, the mouthpiece for the Muslim Brotherhood and al Qaeda. Politico’s Dylan Byers has served as a bulletin board for anything Al Jazeera feeds him, such as his “Al Jazeera is Hiring” story.

We have a media that will not or cannot recognize the nature of the terrorism that claims the lives of Americans here and abroad. It doesn’t seem to matter if the terrorists are communists or Islamists. And when the terrorism occurs, such as in Boston, CNN contributor Juliette Kayyem, a former Obama Administration official, balks at designating the Islamists in the case as Islamic terrorists.

Kayyem has now weighed in on the subject of the State Department’s apparent decision to keep Cuba on its list of state sponsors of terrorism. “We ought to reserve that term for nations that actually use the apparatus of statehood to support targeting of U.S. interests and civilians,” she told the Los Angeles Times, in an effort to whitewash the Castro dictatorship and its support for terrorists like Chesimard.

The Times reporter, Carol J. Williams, also insisted Cuba was out of the terrorism business. She did not mention Chesimard, except for a reference to the Castro brothers giving “refuge to a few fugitive radicals from the Black Panthers….” Nothing was said about Chesimard murdering a New Jersey State Trooper and fleeing to Cuba with the help of the Weather Underground.

This is par for the course for a media that want to play down or distort threats to our safety and security.

© Cliff Kincaid

(KINCAID ARTICLE ENDS HERE)

 

 

But this article by Kincaid does not really answer and indeed it hides who exactly was Ayers, and if we know that it will bring us much closer to understanding the murky background of Obama

 

 

(extract from article by Jared Israel)

 

(EXTRACT STARTS HERE)Notice the repetition verging on self-parody, an effect enhanced by Obama’s complaint, made on ABC Television, that he has had to repeat his ‘I was only eight in 1969 when the Weathermen were active’ mantra “many times.” [6]

The problem is, it’s a lie. Not a straightforward lie, but a tricky or ‘cute’ lie. Because, while the two component clauses are true if taken separately – Obama was eight in 1969, and Ayers and the Weathermen were active that year – once connected by the conjunction ‘when,’ the clauses communicate the lie that Ayers and the Weatherman were inactive after 1969.

The truth? In 1969 the Weathermen bolted from SDS and then conducted some violent demonstrations in Chicago (“Days of Rage”), and a slew of bizarre and violent attacks on ordinary people around the U.S., attacks justified on the grounds that, as Bill Ayers, Mark Rudd and other Weathermen publicly argued, a) while white people are essentially the enemy, nevertheless, b) if put “up against the wall” by physically violent Weathermen, many white working class youth, respecting only violence (i.e., being thugs) would accept the (thuggish) Weathermen’s political positions and join the Revolution, because “fighting knows winning.”

Ironically sloganized as “Power to the People,” not only did these attacks manifest the Weathermen’s signature contempt for working people, but they constituted terror: violence and the tension of threatened violence to coerce the acceptance of their political stance based on fear.  However, it was only after 1969 that the Weathermen began their decade and a half campaign of bombings, complete with much-publicized communiqués, and armed robberies.

So Obama’s defense is a lie. Such a lie is interesting. For one thing, if the crafters are shrewd, the construction of the lie may reveal the liars’ goals, and Obama and his advisors – including the infamous Zbigniew Brzezinski, a leading theoretician of subterfuge – are nothing if not shrewd. [7]

The point of the I-was-only-eight-when-they-were-active lie is:

‘Hey, this Weatherman stuff has no personal meaning for Obama. In 1969 he was just a kid and totally unaware. It’s ancient history for him and should be for you too.’

Notice that while telling us the Weathermen did “despicable” [8] things only in 1969 (thus lying about the Weathermen) Obama also tells us that he was too young to be aware when they were active. This is also a lie. A lie within a lie.

==========================================

Sleeping through the storm?

==========================================

Not only did the Weathermen in fact commit some of their ugliest crimes when Obama was a thinking adult, long after 1969, but their crimes hit him right where he has written he cared the most – the issue of black-white relations. Not to mention that they committed the crimes in his own back yard. And, of special relevance to Obama’s “I-was-only-eight” statement, since he made it to refute the charge that he was and is close to Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn: Ms. Dohrn was implicated.

According to Obama’s New York Times bio, he transferred to Columbia University in Manhattan in August 1981, when he was twenty-years old, and lived in New York until some time in 1984. [9] So he was in New York during his early twenties.

On October 20, 1981, shortly after Obama started the fall term at Columbia, a gang composed of Weathermen and members of the so-called Black Liberation Army staged a Brink’s armored car robbery and vicious triple killing, one of a series of such crimes, dating back to 1976.

Three of the Weathermen (Kathy Boudin, Judith Clark and David Gilbert) were seized fleeing the crime. A media drama followed that lasted several years and that, given how Obama describes himself in his autobiographical book, Dreams from my father, should have horrified him.

Obama’s only possible defense for not mentioning any of this during the months when he was under attack for his alleged ties to Ayers and Dohrn is that he didn’t notice the Weatherman-caused storm that raged in New York during the years he lived there.

Is that believable?

Let us look at the record.

(EXTRACT ENDS HERE)

 

 

The above is from a 4 part series by Jared Israel on

http://emperors-clothes.com/forget.htm

The opening Kincaid article is one of many by that writer and is on

http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/kincaid/130508

Why Jared Israel is offering evidence about Obama in conflict with Kincaid is this:

Ayers and his girlfriend were never prosecuted for murder, even for second degree murder. That is very suspicious.

Could Ayers have been a CIA/FBI recruit?

Kincaid leaves out this possibility. Why would he do that?

The whole manner in how Obama has been promoted is most strange and the key to all of this may lie in Bill Ayers, and in the background of Bill Ayers.

I find personally that where Jared Israel is illuminating the situation, Kincaid is doing the very opposite, and the question is why?

It is worth examining what Kincaid is up to in American and world politics today.

 

SO SOME FURTHER THOUGHS FROM THEMARXISTBLOG

 

Jared Israel Points to the “cute” lie by Obama in his famous autobiography

 

  1. Obama was only eight years of age
  2. The Weathermen terrorists were active in 1969

 

Both indeed are bald and true statements. The President was once eight. The weathermen were active in 69 in that year when he was indeed eight.

 

But when they put the word “when” in the middle everything changes in the meaning. What the harmless little word “when” says is that the Weathermen were active only in 1969. That was their year it is suggested or stated to us. Not the case, they were active much later in say 79 when Obama was a student. And later in his young adulthood.

 

There are many truths in Kincaid´s piece but there are also many lies, “cute” lies as Jared says. We will come to the key paragraph by Kincaid that encapsulates the “cute” lies later.

 

First though about 1969. This was when there was a big radicalisation among students and young workers internationally. It was not just in America, it was also France against De Gaulle and in the north of Ireland in the movement against Britain and its northern state. There it was the Civil Rights Movement and a particularly student movement called “Peoples Democracy”.

 

All are important but it is in America that we have a written record of what happened. The students in New York (Civil Rights pro Black) with Jared Israel in the leadership promoting the new policy decided that on their own as students they could do nothing but be isolated by the state, and that they had to reach out to the working class in America. You can readily see how this would not be very bad and even dangerous for the American capitalist class, which does exist, despite what Kincaid seems to think. Kincaid never mentions the American capitalist class or the American working class.

 

Keeping on top of the story…why Ayers and the Weathermen are SO suspicious is because at the very point where Jared and friends won the leadership of the students to turn to the American working class was when Ayers and co. stormed out to split the student movement.

 

But they did not just split, they set up a terrorist organization, it being well known that terrorist organisations are particularly harmful for the American working class, and that workers know the harmful implications, and that workers have always eschewed terror tactics, and protected themselves against the agent provocateur. Agents provocateurs flock to such terrorist organizations like bees to honey!

 

Jared in this particular article is concentrating on the reality that Obama knew ALL about the terrorists in the FIFTEEN years they were active in HIS area after 1969, so the maths says 8 and 15 … until he was 23!

 

But there is another more important aspect to this in relation to Kincaid. It is contained in this paragraph from the above which I extract to highlight:

 

The truth? In 1969 the Weathermen bolted from SDS and then conducted some violent demonstrations in Chicago (“Days of Rage”), and a slew of bizarre and violent attacks on ordinary people around the U.S., attacks justified on the grounds that, as Bill Ayers, Mark Rudd and other Weathermen publicly argued, a) while white people are essentially the enemy, nevertheless, b) if put “up against the wall” by physically violent Weathermen, many white working class youth, respecting only violence (i.e., being thugs) would accept the (thuggish) Weathermen’s political positions and join the Revolution, because “fighting knows winning.”

 

Bolting from the SDS means the effort to stop the students turning to the American working class

 

Violent demonstrations, bizarre and violent attacks all serve to blacken the name of the student´s movement and to prevent the students making their turn to the American working class.

 

Working class youth respecting only violence being the “philosophy” of those like Ayers who were splitting the student movement.

 

Ask he question: In whose interests was all that taking place – in the interests of the students making their turn to the American working class, or in the interests of the American workers who needed and welcomed the alliance with students.

 

No certainly not! It was all in the interests of the American capitalist class.

 

THAT is what Kincaid is hiding from us about those days.

 

If the American Media has either not reported any of these origins of Ayers or Obama then it is because the American Media represents the interests of the American capitalist class, after all surely that is what they are essentially, selling “news” to make a profit.

 

Let me add that the idea of workers needing to be goaded though terrorist provocation to fight against the capitalist system is pure Bukharin, the historical promoter of Anarchism, and Marxism has done nothing but fight against those concepts ALL of its history.

 

Now then, consider this paragraph, not from Jared this time, but from Kincaid:

 

We have a media that will not or cannot recognize the nature of the terrorism that claims the lives of Americans here and abroad. It doesn’t seem to matter if the terrorists are communists or Islamists. And when the terrorism occurs, such as in Boston, CNN contributor Juliette Kayyem, a former Obama Administration official, balks at designating the Islamists in the case as Islamic terrorists.

 

There he says it! The terrorists are “communists”.

 

But even better The terrorists are “communists or Islamists”

 

But Ayers was the opposite of communism. And communism an Islam are polar opposites. In reality they are enemies, totally.

 

So Ayers you will remember was splitting the students movement on which Jared Israel was a leader. To blacken the movement of students to the working class.

 

Now Kincaid is calling communists or marxists even terrorists or “islamists” straight after the Boston Bombings.

 

This is psy-ops, deliberate blackening the name of Marxism by telling lies, saying that Marxism is linked to terror, or to Islam. Which just after Boston and Woolwich is the same thing!

 

Prompting the question: Who is Cliff Kincaid and who does he work for?

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s